Epinions.com 
Join Epinions | Help | Sign In   
Home > Message Boards > Epinions > Epinions General > "Communities" and Treatment of Newbies

"Communities" and Treatment of Newbies
Posts on this Topic   Search in Epinions General   
Showing 1-20 of 47 posts   Page 1 2 3 - View all Next 
Hide member images Print         
   
scmrak Original Post: Nov 14 '08,  6:54 am           
Reviews written: 1209
Member since: Sep 27 '00
Post: 209076
"Communities" and Treatment of Newbies

Several times over the years I've dipped into "community forums" set up by merchants to do the "users-supporting-users" thing. Some of my experiences are as follows:

• at the forums for a mammoth software product (whose name starts with "A" and reminds me of southwestern architecture) I registered (as required) to ask a question. The first response didn't have an answer, but did have comments about the user name I'd used (no, it wasn't "adobesux" - that one had already been taken)
• at the forums for a former telephone company's television/telephone/internet service, I asked where I could get hardcopies of the documentation the installer had neglected to leave. The first response asked me just why I thought I was entitled to paper copies.

With those experiences in mind, seems to me that the reception newbies get when they come here is pertty friendly - even those who are frothing at the mouth get replies to their questions and comments without sniping or condescension.

Anyone else?

-30-

rex

   
phungus Posted: Nov 14 '08,  7:34 am           
Reviews written: 2145
Member since: Aug 31 '99
Post: 209085
RE:

Quote: scmrak
Several times over the years I've dipped into "community forums" set up by merchants to do the "users-supporting-users" thing. Some of my experiences are as follows:

• at the forums for a mammoth software product (whose name starts with "A" and reminds me of southwestern architecture) I registered (as required) to ask a question. The first response didn't have an answer, but did have comments about the user name I'd used (no, it wasn't "adobesux" - that one had already been taken)
• at the forums for a former telephone company's television/telephone/internet service, I asked where I could get hardcopies of the documentation the installer had neglected to leave. The first response asked me just why I thought I was entitled to paper copies.

With those experiences in mind, seems to me that the reception newbies get when they come here is pertty friendly - even those who are frothing at the mouth get replies to their questions and comments without sniping or condescension.

Anyone else?

-30-

rex


I think the newbies that come in here with the right attitide are treated well.

It's the ones who start threads about other users and launch lots of insults that get their butts handed to them.
   
ladyconsumer Posted: Nov 14 '08,  7:38 am           
Reviews written: 490
Member since: Jul 11 '05
Post: 209086
RE:

I occasionally post (and frequently lurk) on the message boards of a very large movies information database. I can not believe the rudeness and sniping that goes on over there. If you dare to express a dislike for a movie that someone loves you're frequently called a loser. Or told that, clearly, you're too much of a moron to have understood the movie.

I'm quite certain that the people being so rude and nasty on these boards aren't that way in real life. I think the cloak of anonymity on a message board allows people to dare to be how they'd never be in a face-to-face conversation.

That said, I don't think we jump on newbies here, just because they're newbies. We're equal-opportunity jumpers here. We jump on people who come off as nasty or argumentative, whether they're newbies or not.


Mona

ps: so, apparently, if your post's title starts with a quotation mark, it doesn't carry over to the next post. Where's that can of Raid?

   
shopaholic_man Posted: Nov 14 '08,  7:50 am           
Reviews written: 890
Member since: Feb 15 '04
moderator in Movies
Post: 209087
RE:

Quote: ladyconsumer
I occasionally post (and frequently lurk) on the message boards of a very large movies information database. I can not believe the rudeness and sniping that goes on over there. If you dare to express a dislike for a movie that someone loves you're frequently called a loser. Or told that, clearly, you're too much of a moron to have understood the movie.




I think as long as people come in without a negative attitude or trollish behavior, they are treated well and answers and thoughts are freely given.

Unless of course they are some stupid non movie watching person that dislikes an obvious cult classic because they failed to understand the directors meaning and the message of the film.

EC Mark, who also reads, but rarely posts at a certain database on the internet that categorizes all the movies
   
scmrak Posted: Nov 14 '08,  9:40 am (Updated: Nov 14 '08,  9:40 am)           
Reviews written: 1209
Member since: Sep 27 '00
Post: 209099
RE: Communities and Treatment of Newbies

Quote: phungus
I think the newbies that come in here with the right attitide are treated well.
I think that even people who come in with the wrong attitude are treated pretty well, don't you? Many's the time I've seen someone lambaste the site for not being so intuitive that a non-carbon-based life form would understand it instantly; and they're almost always treated respectfully by people who commiserate with them and try to point them to answers and fixes. And I've yet to see anyone give a member flak over a username.

-30-

rex

   
carstairs38 Posted: Nov 14 '08,  9:41 am           
Reviews written: 949
Member since: Oct 03 '05
Post: 209101
RE:

Quote: ladyconsumer
I'm quite certain that the people being so rude and nasty on these boards aren't that way in real life. I think the cloak of anonymity on a message board allows people to dare to be how they'd never be in a face-to-face conversation.

Mona

ps: so, apparently, if your post's title starts with a quotation mark, it doesn't carry over to the next post. Where's that can of Raid?


I have often wondered the same thing about the many nasty people I've met on line. (Very few of them here, BTW.) I really do think that the anonimity of the internet has cheapened our national discourse on many an issue.

As to Rex's point, I do think we try, especially here on the boards, to be open and welcoming to anyone new, even if they don't put their best foot forward. Could we do better? You bet. It's always something to strive for. But compared to some of what is out there, we do have a leg up.

(And as far as the quotation marks go, any time there is one in the post title, the rest of the title vanishes when someone clicks reply. Even if the quote is in the middle of the title.)

Mark
   
coldsteel7 Posted: Nov 14 '08,  10:32 am           
Reviews written: 526
Member since: Dec 03 '99
Post: 209108
RE:

Quote: ladyconsumer
I occasionally post (and frequently lurk) on the message boards of a very large movies information database. I can not believe the rudeness and sniping that goes on over there. If you dare to express a dislike for a movie that someone loves you're frequently called a loser. Or told that, clearly, you're too much of a moron to have understood the movie.

I'm quite certain that the people being so rude and nasty on these boards aren't that way in real life. I think the cloak of anonymity on a message board allows people to dare to be how they'd never be in a face-to-face conversation.

That said, I don't think we jump on newbies here, just because they're newbies. We're equal-opportunity jumpers here. We jump on people who come off as nasty or argumentative, whether they're newbies or not.


Mona

ps: so, apparently, if your post's title starts with a quotation mark, it doesn't carry over to the next post. Where's that can of Raid?


If you lurk at the movie database I'm thinking of, then you have certainly seen the blatant racism and inappropriate content that absolutely would not be tolerated here. I have been aghast at some of the posting at the movie database website that I frequent.

John
   
lllovemakeup Posted: Nov 14 '08,  11:11 am (Updated: Nov 14 '08,  11:18 am)           
Reviews written: 69
Member since: Jul 05 '08
Post: 209113
RE:

Quote: coldsteel7

...I have been aghast at some of the posting at the movie database website that I frequent.

John


I, too, have read boards that contained comments that were racist, sexist, and just plain mean.

Here on these boards, I have been treated with respect and kindness; and, as some get to know me and my sense of humor, a little harmless joshing...(see my dopey username, which was explained in a previous thread)

That being said, these boards are fraught with conflicting information that can make a newbie want to pull her/his hair out.

Here's one example:
Part one: When I first started posting reviews here, they were all in the Wellness/Beauty section. I was fortunate enough to never once receive a SH rating, but I received several Helpful ratings with no comments from the advisors as to what would make them VH. (I once emailed an Advisor and very nicely asked her what I could do to improve, and she couldn't be bothered to reply.) Because of my perfectionistic tendencies, I started reading VH reviews written by people with hats. I discovered that the VH reviews in Beauty contained details I, personally, didn't think important...such as ingredient lists, etc. (I've since learned that a lot of ladies there want to know ingredients as they only want "all natural" or "paraben-free," etc.) Once I started adding every single bit of information (short of the name of the CEO's children), I started getting VH ratings.

Part two: One can find messages on this board that indicate that requirements for VH ratings vary from category to category. So true.

Part three: One can find many messages on this board making fun of, or otherwise giving a written roll-of-the-eyes, to people who include lots of information such as "ingredients." I've even seen it referred to as "inane." Inane means "lacking significance," but depending on which category one is in, that is simply not the case should one be desirous of a VH rating.

Because of some of the judgment I see, I'm going to venture a guess that such things could keep someone off someone else's WOT because the reader may think the person's writing includes too many inane details, but, in fact, the reviewer must include that info to get a VH rating...which I think we all want.

So, what's a newbie to do?

Julie
   
jurgrace Posted: Nov 14 '08,  11:56 am           
Reviews written: 207
Member since: Nov 26 '07
Post: 209120
RE:

Quote: lllovemakeup
I, too, have read boards that contained comments that were racist, sexist, and just plain mean.

Here on these boards, I have been treated with respect and kindness; and, as some get to know me and my sense of humor, a little harmless joshing...(see my dopey username, which was explained in a previous thread)

That being said, these boards are fraught with conflicting information that can make a newbie want to pull her/his hair out.

Here's one example:
Part one: When I first started posting reviews here, they were all in the Wellness/Beauty section. I was fortunate enough to never once receive a SH rating, but I received several Helpful ratings with no comments from the advisors as to what would make them VH. (I once emailed an Advisor and very nicely asked her what I could do to improve, and she couldn't be bothered to reply.) Because of my perfectionistic tendencies, I started reading VH reviews written by people with hats. I discovered that the VH reviews in Beauty contained details I, personally, didn't think important...such as ingredient lists, etc. (I've since learned that a lot of ladies there want to know ingredients as they only want "all natural" or "paraben-free," etc.) Once I started adding every single bit of information (short of the name of the CEO's children), I started getting VH ratings.

Part two: One can find messages on this board that indicate that requirements for VH ratings vary from category to category. So true.

Part three: One can find many messages on this board making fun of, or otherwise giving a written roll-of-the-eyes, to people who include lots of information such as "ingredients." I've even seen it referred to as "inane." Inane means "lacking significance," but depending on which category one is in, that is simply not the case should one be desirous of a VH rating.

Because of some of the judgment I see, I'm going to venture a guess that such things could keep someone off someone else's WOT because the reader may think the person's writing includes too many inane details, but, in fact, the reviewer must include that info to get a VH rating...which I think we all want.

So, what's a newbie to do?

Julie


Julie, that was very well-put. I also feel that the elements needed for a VH review differ by category. The 10-4-10 offered additional motivation for the VH rating, which, combined with the more stringent criteria in certain categories, is why I think a lot of people have a hard time following pops' advice to diversify.

Hopefully, including the 'inane' information would not be the only thing to keep someone from adding certain writers to their WOT.

In answer to your question, I have no idea what a newbie should do.

Grace
   
carstairs38 Posted: Nov 14 '08,  11:57 am           
Reviews written: 949
Member since: Oct 03 '05
Post: 209121
RE:

Quote: lllovemakeup
Because of some of the judgment I see, I'm going to venture a guess that such things could keep someone off someone else's WOT because the reader may think the person's writing includes too many inane details, but, in fact, the reviewer must include that info to get a VH rating...which I think we all want.

So, what's a newbie to do?

Julie


Panic. It's always the best first response.

All kidding aside, the newbie has to remember that we who post on the boards represent a small fraction of the community. I personally, find ingredients lists (or complete lists of actors) to be inane. I can look that up elsewhere. I want to know what you think of the product, not what the product is made of. (Obvious example is if the ingredients make a huge different in your experience with the product. Even then, I wouldn't think listing all of them would be necessary.)

So, if I found myself in your shoes, I would probably do what you do, post the ingredients when a category seemed to demand it and leave them out when another category doesn't want it.

And frankly, I do think that discovering these things is part of the process of joining any new site, not just ours. The important thing is to try to help make the transition from newbie to community member as smooth and painless as possible.

It is unfortunate that we have so many different communities and community standards on the site. But at this point, I don't see an easy way to form one set of standards when so many opinionated people are involved.

Mark
   
talyseon Posted: Nov 14 '08,  12:10 pm (Updated: Nov 14 '08,  8:51 pm)           
Reviews written: 494
Member since: Jan 17 '08
Post: 209126
RE:

Quote: lllovemakeup
.

Here on these boards, I have been treated with respect and kindness; and, as some get to know me and my sense of humor, a little harmless joshing...(see my dopey username, which was explained in a previous thread)

That being said, these boards are fraught with conflicting information that can make a newbie want to pull her/his hair out.

Here's one example:
Part one: When I first started posting reviews here, they were all in the Wellness/Beauty section. I was fortunate enough to never once receive a SH rating, but I received several Helpful ratings with no comments from the advisors as to what would make them VH. (I once emailed an Advisor and very nicely asked her what I could do to improve, and she couldn't be bothered to reply.) Because of my perfectionistic tendencies, I started reading VH reviews written by people with hats. I discovered that the VH reviews in Beauty contained details I, personally, didn't think important...such as ingredient lists, etc. (I've since learned that a lot of ladies there want to know ingredients as they only want "all natural" or "paraben-free," etc.) Once I started adding every single bit of information (short of the name of the CEO's children), I started getting VH ratings.

Part two: One can find messages on this board that indicate that requirements for VH ratings vary from category to category. So true.

Part three: One can find many messages on this board making fun of, or otherwise giving a written roll-of-the-eyes, to people who include lots of information such as "ingredients." I've even seen it referred to as "inane." Inane means "lacking significance," but depending on which category one is in, that is simply not the case should one be desirous of a VH rating.

Because of some of the judgment I see, I'm going to venture a guess that such things could keep someone off someone else's WOT because the reader may think the person's writing includes too many inane details, but, in fact, the reviewer must include that info to get a VH rating...which I think we all want.

So, what's a newbie to do?

Julie


One, realize that you are not going to please everyone. I can understand about the ingredients. I personally do not care what is in lipstick. I know there is bat guano in there, and that pretty much does it for me. However, there are ingredients that ARE important. There are things that some people are allergic to, so if you include the ingredients, it is a help to those people.

There are things people care about. I would love to see every review on this site list the country of origin; we are exporting all our manufacturing jobs, and one way to combat this is to buy American made. How do you find American Made? I think this is something we could help with. In the Pros, write American Made. In the Cons write made in China. This is just my personal little soapbox, and not one I expect everyone to fall in line with.

That said, I was taken by the fact you wrote an advisor and were ignored. I find that appalling. I have written to one advisor in movies and books to ask why when the whole world thought one of my review (edited) was very helpful or even MOST HELPFUL, they only gave it an H.

I never recieved a reply to any of the three emails I sent. And that is enough to keep this excellent author off my Web of Trust.

Overall, I think we are very kind to Newbies. Continued.
   
talyseon Posted: Nov 14 '08,  12:22 pm           
Reviews written: 494
Member since: Jan 17 '08
Post: 209132
Continued.....

....One way I judge a newbie and their seriousness is this; if I leave a comment about how to improve their work, I usually link in to an advice piece I wrote. If they clean it up, I pay attention. If they read the piece, I usually subscribe to their reviews for a month or two, just to keep an eye on them.

If they leave that solid block of text with spelling errors, and go on to write eight more just like it, I ignore them, pretty much forever.

If they get rude about it "i didnt no this was a *(&^*& enlish teachers sight!" I block them.

Understand, we collectively create the site, and set its tone. And we should be proud; this is a great friendly site. We have the tools to police jerks, and we do. That is very rare, and I am very thankful for it. I avoid those other sites where my parentage is questioned because I thought a particular movie could have been better.

And as far as the advisor goes; if you think an advisor has fallen down upon the job, there is a form to address that.

Talyseon.

   
scmrak Posted: Nov 14 '08,  12:23 pm (Updated: Nov 14 '08,  12:25 pm)           
Reviews written: 1209
Member since: Sep 27 '00
Post: 209133
RE:

Quote: lllovemakeup
...I once emailed an Advisor and very nicely asked her what I could do to improve, and she couldn't be bothered to reply...
I recently emailed (more than 300 words) an experienced contributor who withdrew his/her Cars & Motorsports review in a huff after not getting VH ratings (and getting both comments and emailed assistance in improving), but s/he couldn't be bothered to reply. It works both ways.
   
sleeper54 Posted: Nov 14 '08,  1:16 pm           
Reviews written: 436
Member since: Feb 24 '01
Post: 209139
RE: Communities and Treatment of Newbies

Quote: scmrak
--snip--

And I've yet to see anyone give a member flak over a username.

-30-

rex

I have but one example of a terrible user-name. I also do not recall any public scorn because of it.

Checking now I see 'she' is not active and the account is community-blocked.

Quality tells out every time.



Quote: carstairs38
Panic. It's always the best first response.

--snip--

Mark

I thought paranoia came before panic. Well, except alphabetically...


Interesting discussion.



...tom...
.
   
lllovemakeup Posted: Nov 14 '08,  1:17 pm (Updated: Nov 14 '08,  1:21 pm)           
Reviews written: 69
Member since: Jul 05 '08
Post: 209140
RE:

Grace, Mark, Talyseon, Scmrak~

Thank you all for your thoughtful replies.

Grace: thanks for adding to the discussion. You're right.

Mark: Panic...that was funny! I, too, think this learning curve is just part of it. I was in no way complaining, I was simply trying to convey a personal experience to help people understand. I've gotten the hang of it, but it wasn't that long ago that I was confused as all get out.

Hey, waddayamean these boards represent a small part?! I thought this was where all important decisions/judgments were made! teehee You know I'm kidding; I've said it before, I love these boards.

Talyseon: How coincidental that I've pointed out in reviews that something was made in the USA as I like that as well. Speaking from experience, I was nearly always treated nicely as a newbie. As such, I try to return the favor and offer help to brand-spanking new members. Some will listen, and some won't. I accept that...everyone is different. One of my favorite things about this site is there is such a diverse group of people with differing opinions. As I previously stated, I just wanted to point out one example of moderate confusion I had a while back.

BTW, I considered filling out the complaint form to report the advisor, but couldn't bring myself to do it.

And, finally, Scmrak:

I have no doubt that it works both ways, but since I was speaking from personal experience, I will say the behavior of the person you tried to help is certainly not a behavior I would exhibit. If someone sends me an email, I reply. It's simple manners, but not everyone has them.

That being said, in reference to your specific comment, I'll say this: right or wrong, it is my opinion that CLs should be held to a somewhat higher standard than the average yahoo. A CL is chosen to lead, and who should know how to conduct him/herself. I know you did the right thing in trying to help the person in C & M. They simply took it the wrong way, or whatever. Uh, and some people are just huffy.


Okay, again everyone, understand I was not complaining, I was simply pointing out one confusing experience I had regarding conflicting information as a newbie. Overall, my experience has been exceedingly wonderful and fun. I've met some incredible people, and will always be glad I joined this little motley crew.

   
George_Chabot Posted: Nov 14 '08,  1:55 pm (Updated: Nov 14 '08,  1:59 pm)           
Reviews written: 1608
Member since: Feb 09 '00
Post: 209155
RE:

I agree with your observation of the ingredient lists. Since I read for enjoyment and can find my own information if I want it, I don't typically read much from writers who can't post without a label copy, nutrition facts blurb, and so on. Same with complete cast lists copied from one of those movie data base places. This is fun for me and I don't need aggravation. ;> YMMV

   
lllovemakeup Posted: Nov 14 '08,  2:14 pm           
Reviews written: 69
Member since: Jul 05 '08
Post: 209157
RE:

Quote: George_Chabot
I agree with your observation of the ingredient lists. Since I read for enjoyment and can find my own information if I want it, I don't typically read much from writers who can't post without a label copy, nutrition facts blurb, and so on. Same with complete cast lists copied from one of those movie data base places. This is fun for me and I don't need aggravation. ;> YMMV


One thing I do to try to help accommodate people who read my wellness and beauty reviews (where they like all the details spelled out) is I divide my review and clearly indicate "Ingredients:", etc. so people can skip over it if they want, or read it if it's important to them. That's been working well for me.
   
popsrocks Posted: Nov 14 '08,  4:01 pm           
Reviews written: 1873
Member since: Aug 25 '02
moderator in Gourmet, Restaurants
Post: 209172
RE:

Quote: lllovemakeup
One thing I do to try to help accommodate people who read my wellness and beauty reviews (where they like all the details spelled out) is I divide my review and clearly indicate "Ingredients:", etc. so people can skip over it if they want, or read it if it's important to them. That's been working well for me.


Good point!! I believe that's an excellent way of handling extras.

Though I read a review for the experience a person has had with a product, destination or service, I also feel there can't be too much information in a review. Ya, never know what is of importance and value to the next guy/gal.

What I believe is important however, is to title and break up a review in such manner that a reader can easily look for the facts that are of interest to him/her and/or skip over what they may consider "inane".

Scrolling down a review, picking and choosing what's important to me, is so very easy to do.

pops
   
Trawma Posted: Nov 14 '08,  4:22 pm           
Reviews written: 405
Member since: Jan 09 '00
Post: 209176
RE:

Quote: ladyconsumer
I occasionally post (and frequently lurk) on the message boards of a very large movies information database.


I also hang out on that web-based movie information giant, and I, too, tend to eschew posting because the reception is so often a bit less than friendly. Between that and some of my newsgroups, I find that, by comparison, Epinions is probably one of the warmest, nicest, most newbie-friendly places I've been.

Kris
   
anderclayton Posted: Nov 14 '08,  6:48 pm           
Reviews written: 50
Member since: Dec 18 '99
Post: 209192
RE:

Quote: jurgrace
Julie, that was very well-put. I also feel that the elements needed for a VH review differ by category.


I would actually suggest that the elements needed vary from person to person which might be even further confusing to people. But the category breaks are sorta (SORTA) uniform.

Ander
Hide member images Print         
Showing 1-20 of 47 posts   Page 1 2 3 - View all Next 
Return to top

Help | Member Center | Message Boards | Site Rules | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Site Index | Topic Index  
About Epinions | Careers | Contact Epinions | Advertising  

Epinions | Shopping.com | Rent.com | Free Classifieds

Shopping.com Network © 1999-2008 Shopping.com, Inc. Trademark Notice

Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources,
so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.